An interesting article in the Northern District Times explains the differences between figures used by people predicting a house price crash, and those expecting stability and even continuing growth.
Jeremy Grantham, a US investment banker, says Australian property is a time bomb, alleging the house price ratio compared to disposable income is 7.5 times, around double what it should be.
Rismark disputes this, blaming foreign hedge funds for shorting Australian bank shares in anticipation of a housing bubble bursting. Rismark calculates the house price ratio as 4.6, by using all properties in Australia, not just the cities. Of course, this really reflects the fact that most people don't want to live in rural areas despite cheap housing.
The deputy governor of the Reserve Bank, Ric Battellino, supported Rismark's view, agreeing that city house prices are "quite elevated" but if you look across the whole country prices are not that different to thos in other countries. He says that house prices in Australian cities are not high relative to the incomes in the cities.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment